tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3048449668150968412.post8990231104961765465..comments2023-11-14T08:19:54.657+00:00Comments on DMossEsq: Seven professors and a virtuous circleDavid Mosshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12345636878071983416noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3048449668150968412.post-29684748480099147032014-01-15T18:12:35.309+00:002014-01-15T18:12:35.309+00:00This explains a lot about the misfeasance I have e...This explains a lot about the misfeasance I have encountered in the Cabinet Office when it comes to trying to explain new software technology that could deliver significant savings BUT it did not fit with their interests in building their own "start up" with GDS.<br /> <br />This attribute of Group-think hits the spot "The group at the same time fails to engage in rigorous reality-testing, with possible alternative courses of action not being realistically appraised." This applies to use of open source as the Minister made it quite clear it must be competitive with other technology solutions. But this has never been implemented. <br /><br />This Group-think syndrome explains a great deal! But Politicians are paid to ensure such behaviour does not happen? Maybe time someone took to court from a previous post "Misfeasance in public office is the only specifically public law tort, and provides a remedy for citizens who have suffered loss due to the abuse of power by a public officer acting in bad faith" <br /><br />Any lawyers with a public spirit to stop abuse of power out there fancy a challenge.....I have the evidence.....David knows who I am!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com