Why is Mr Maxwell telling us what the government won't be doing? There are an infinite number of things that the government won't be doing. Why is he telling us about this one in particular?
Mr Maxwell's non-announcement is made in a PublicTechnology.net article, Bracken outlines G-Cloud engagement aim, about the putative savings made by the Government Digital Service (GDS) and their award-winning GOV.UK. Public Servant of the Year ex-Guardian man Mike Bracken CBE, executive director of GDS, says: "We are finding there is a lot of education to be done ... In the next Parliament we will engage more with the wider public sector on G-Cloud".
"The government will undertake more intensive engagement and education for local authorities on the G-Cloud purchasing framework from next year", as PublicTechnology.net put it.
What's going on? Why is poor old local government being singled out for re-education in Bracken's second term?
It all goes back to a BBC business news article, Councils 'wasting millions' ignoring government IT cloud:
G-Cloud – the Government Cloud – is the Cabinet Office initiative to make it easier for central and local government departments to buy IT products and services.
Cloud services are "quicker, cheaper and more competitive", according to Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude, with some tech companies estimating that they can be 25% to 60% cheaper than traditional long-term IT contracts.
Despite this, G-Cloud is largely being ignored by county councils
To most people, putting your applications and data in the cloud means losing control of them. But if Francis "JFDI" Maude says that cloud computing is "quicker, cheaper and more competitive", that's good enough for the BBC and they go on in their article to quote the "shocking findings" of Bull Information Systems:
And not just Mr Carr. The BBC also quote Phil Dawson of Skyscape saying that adopting cloud is a "no-brainer":
The findings have emerged after IT services company Bull Information Systems carried out Freedom of Information requests on all 27 UK county councils - 26 responded.
"We think these findings are hugely disappointing and quite shocking," Andrew Carr, Bull's UK and Ireland chief executive, told the BBC.
"By sharing infrastructure costs and moving to the cloud, county councils could take 20% to 25% out of total IT costs - they're wasting millions not doing this."
Who knows, but perhaps local government prefers to use its brain?
Switching from long-term contacts with IT providers selling hardware and software to "pay as you go" virtual services with a variety of providers is a "no-brainer", according to Phil Dawson, chief executive of Skyscape Cloud Services, a G-Cloud accredited provider.
There again, perhaps local government is just being selfishly recalcitrant in the face of "modernisation" because it will involve job losses (40,000 of them, that's the figure GDS always quote). Even there, the helpful Mr Dawson has some advice. Let them
That's presumably what convinces the Taxpayers' Alliance to say in the same BBC article:
"There's no doubt locally run data centres would close," he says. "But there's also an opportunity to create jobs in the app development sector to compensate."
It may beggar the Taxpayers' Alliance's belief but perhaps there is actually a case against cloud computing that they haven't considered. Local government have made a few attempts to explain it, e.g. Socitm challenges G-Cloud 'waste' report and Councils deny 'wasting millions' by ignoring G-Cloud. The Taxpayers' Alliance may recant when it occurs to them that by putting all taxpayers' records in the cloud, HMRC would lose control of them.
"At a time when councils are finding long-overdue savings across their operations, it beggars belief that they are not taking advantage of these new, money-saving technologies.
"Taxpayers expect their council tax to be spent on essential front-line services, not unnecessarily expensive IT."
You can join in with the popular rubbishing of local government if you like. Up to you. It's fashionable. There's a lot of it about. You could take a look at the Technology Manifesto published by Policy Exchange, the "think" tank, if you want to know what memes are trending at the moment. Them, or the New Local Government Network – they're always good for a sneer.
Just be aware that (a) that's where most government takes place, locally, and (b) there is a plan – the plan that is denied in the PublicTechnology.net article that we opened with.
Last January, Richard Copley wrote Let’s Replace Council Websites with Local.Gov.Uk – a GDS for Local Government. Mr Copley thinks it would be feasible and beneficial if there was just one website for all of local government in the UK, just as there is notionally just one website – GOV.UK – for central government:
It may be arithmetically obvious to Mr Copley that the British Constitution should be re-written. You may disagree. You may feel that the Martha-now-Lady Lane Fox revolution has already been indulged with too much credulous observation. But the Estonian plan is there. As PublicTechnology.net say:
... there are 326 Local Authorities (LAs)/Councils in England.
That’s 326 organisation doing, pretty much, the same thing. In terms of IT this means 326 websites, 326 email systems, 326 social care systems, 326 planning systems, 326 education systems etc etc ...
I estimate that an averaged sized Council will be running around 75 different ‘line of business’ applications – by which I mean the ‘serious’ software that’s used to underpin service delivery, I’m excluding client installs such as CAD or pseudo-systems like MS Access databases and spreadsheets.
326 x 75 = 24,250 software applications.
So the first benefit of a Local GDS is obvious – increased efficiency through removal of expensive duplication ...
"The first event", PublicTechnology.net tell us on 9 June 2014, "taking place next week is being run by the Department of Communities and Local Government in partnership with the Government Digital Services ... The second event, a 'Hackathon', is being held the next week in Birmingham, and is being organised by council digital network LocalGov Digital, with innovation charity Nesta".
The issue will come under discussion at two events being run by local government organisations in the coming two weeks.
DMossEsq's millions of readers already know that the popular belief among politicians, public servants and the media that GDS have the experience to govern the UK is inexplicable. They know that behind the self-regarding publicity very little has been delivered by GDS and quite a lot has been delivered by other departments of central and local government. They also know that these moves to centralise, consolidate and standardise public services rarely deliver the savings promised. What they do deliver is too much power in one place.
What the millions may not know is that there was a showcase for digital government held at the Royal Institution, of all places, the day before yesterday, 13 June 2014 – PrimeConf: "Our conference is going to be a celebration of great British technology and technologists. Taking a countrywide approach we have invited guest speakers from around Britain to talk about what they know and what they do. We will also be live streaming the event so everyone who wants to can watch regardless of location".
Public Servant of the Year ex-Guardian man Mike Bracken CBE, executive director of GDS, spoke at the conference on Introducing the Govstack: British Civic Infrastructure For The Digital Age:
Local government can get a taste of what they're in for from the #PrimeConf Twitter feed. For example:
From canals to sewers, heavy industry to nanotechnology, British public services have kept us ahead in the global race. Now we are creating civic infrastructure fit for the digital age
The man being quoted there, the man who tweets as @undermanager, is Russell Davies, "a Creative Director at GDS".
That's the wisdom which GDS brings to the table. Government is a medium-sized dating site. Good luck, local government.