Tuesday 29 October 2013

GDS & assisted digital – the project that keeps on starting

When Martha-now-Lady Lane Fox decreed that all public services should be digital by default (14 October 2010) she created a problem – how do you avoid all the people unversed in digital ways being excluded by default?

The problem was given to the Government Digital Service (GDS) to solve. A strange choice. GDS's expertise is in building websites, not helping old ladies to fill in attendance allowance forms. What special knowledge would they bring to bear? None. GDS's natural inclination would be to devise a digital solution. That's their approach to all problems but in this case it's definitively inappropriate. It's strange that GDS accepted the rôle.

But accept it they did and they gave the problem a name – "assisted digital" – and they started blogging about it (28 July 2011). Nearly a year later (30 May 2012) they published Getting started on assisted digital.

Assisted digital keeps on starting. Another year later (23 May 2013) GDS published Starting the conversation about providing assisted digital support. It started again a month later (20 June 2013), Engaging the market: "Last week we held our first ‘market engagement’ event for suppliers interested in providing assisted digital support for government services. It was really popular ...".

Then (2 August 2013) they held a workshop to answer the question What about people who aren't online?. Yes, that is the question, that was the question on 14 October 2010, what is the answer?

What is the answer? Consultants.

Peter Ziegler from the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design was called in and blogged (12 August 2013):
My research has been a very fruitful introduction to the problems older people may face when accessing digital products and services. There have been two key early observations that keep coming up:

1. People who do not have much confidence in their digital skills are more comfortable conducting a one-way search query than a two-way personal information transaction.  For example, people may very well be confident with searching the Internet for a shop’s location, but they would not feel comfortable going to that shop’s website to make a purchase to be delivered to their home.

2. Older people who do not have access to computers or who lack the skills to confidently navigate the Internet are concerned about where they will get help to access the services they need. As services are increasingly administered online, there is a requirement for assisted digital provision to be in place and be adequately publicised to ensure these people know where to go for help.
Who knew?

A few weeks later (2 September 2013) Mr Ziegler produced Early design ideas for assisted digital from the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design:
Digital bike delivery
And now, three years after Lady Lane Fox fired the starting pistol, where are we?

GDS have launched a new assisted digital blog.

It's a new blog but the same people are blogging. Including the indefatigable Peter Ziegler (22 October 2013), Exploring assisted digital for electoral registration with the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design:
I asked myself questions such as:
  • what is already in older people’s wallets?
  • what do older people already do at home?
  • where do older people go during the day?
----------

Updated 12 December 2013:

Ex-Guardian man Mike Bracken has produced his December 2013 quarterly report: "GDS has been running a research project with the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design on how assisted digital support can meet the needs of older people".

That's true.

The question is why? According to the quarterly report, "the project has helped government to understand the reasons why older people are completely or partially offline, and with exploring potential design solutions".

It's because they're old. And they're not confident with computers. And they don't have computers at home. That's what we've learned from Peter Ziegler of the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design. But we already knew that. That's why we have an assisted digital project.

And here's another "potential design solution" – this time, not a cargo bike in sight:

Digital dialogues

The quarterly report tells us also that: "We’re benchmarking the success of digital inclusion initiatives, sharing what works and what doesn’t work, to help people go online. We will publish digital inclusion principles, developed with help from our departmental colleagues and our cross-sector partners, early in the new year. We will be consulting the public on these principles as a first step towards a digital inclusion strategy that we will publish later in the spring. This will say what departments, partners and GDS will do to help people go online".

"First step towards a digital inclusion strategy"? "Publish later in the spring"? Assisted digital's not going to be started again, is it, re-re-re-started?

Updated 29.8.14

"What", you ask, "has been happening to assisted digital since your last update?".

Good question.

One answer came yesterday, with the publication of Assisted digital user personas on the Government Digital Service's assisted digital blog:
We have developed a set of 8 personas that reflect the citizens who need help to use digital government services as they lack either the means, ability or confidence to do so independently. One of these represents the needs of service providers and the challenges they may also face with the move to digital by default. Collectively the personas highlight the range of complex and hidden assisted digital needs we identified through our research.
And?
... we looked at the persona ‘Greg’, a farmer with no internet access and low digital skills. The challenges he faces when he completes his application for a Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) payment are largely the same as when he buys a fishing rod licence or completes his self assessment tax return. Presenting the challenges through this persona gave departments the opportunity to see how they could work together to be more efficient in delivering support and to provide a better service for Greg.
"Buying a fishing rod licence isn't even remotely the same as applying for a CAP payment", you may say, "but, be that as it may, how is 'Greg' being helped by GDS's efforts?".

Answer:
The personas have really helped us to explain, in an engaging and empathic way, who assisted digital users are and what their key concerns are in accessing digital services. Sticking their pictures on the wall and using them in workshops has also helped to open up wider discussions about what assisted digital support could look like.
'Greg' still doesn't have any internet access and his digital skills are still low but, never mind the user needs, GDS are now engaging and empathic, whatever that is.


Updated 11.11.14

GDS have had so much experience now, starting assisted digital, that they're offering consultancy advice to other organisations, please see How to get started with your assisted digital user research.


Updated 17.11.14

From The Register:
UK digi exclusion: Poor families without internet access could 'miss out' on child tax credit
By Kelly Fiveash, 16 Nov 2014

Brits who aren't online but are entitled to access to the Tory-led Coalition government's childcare tax break could lose out, it has been reported.

According to the Independent on Sunday, which was handed a leaked letter to MPs from Exchequer Secretary Priti Patel, up to 200,000 families could be affected when the new tax is brought in next year ...

Updated 3.8.15

GDS's assisted digital project started, remember, on 28 July 2011. And on 30 May 2012 and 23 May 2013 and 20 June 2013, please see above.

1,464 days after the first start, it's started again. On 31 July 2015. Please see GDS puts out feelers for inclusion support:
The Government Digital Service (GDS) has stepped up the effort to get more people going online with the first stage of a procurement for training services.
This is just the "first stage" of procurement. Not even that, really, more a case of putting out feelers before the first stage.


Updated 19.11.15

GDS's assisted digital project, which started on 28 July 2011 and 30 May 2012 and 23 May 2013 and 20 June 2013 and 31 July 2015, will next start some time after 18 January 2016 – that's the date when tenders must be submitted to join "a framework agreement for suppliers to provide training and digital support services to help reduce digital exclusion".

That's what the Government Computing website tells us today in GDS and BIS tender aims to tackle digital exclusion. Unchanged since 28 July 2011, the idea 1,575 days later is still to "reduce the number of digitally excluded people in the UK".

We learn that "around 10.5m people in the UK lack basic digital skills" and what's more Rachel Neaman, chief executive of Go ON UK, says: "Our latest research tells us that there are still 12.6 million adults in the UK without the Basic Digital Skills they need".

This Rachel Neaman gets about a bit. She's also the Chair of Digital Leaders. If you've ever wondered what you have to do to be called a "digital leader" in the UK, it's easy. Sponsor Digital Leaders. 16 companies have worked that one out, including our old friends Skyscape, Kainos and Methods.

Wasn't Martha Lane Fox going to sort out digital exclusion with her DotEveryone idea, floated at this year's Dimbleby Lecture? You may well ask.

Whatever, the Martha Lane Fox/digital-by-default problem remains unsolved. The unwebbed are excluded by default. All 10.5 million of them. Or 12.6 million. But at least GDS have made a start. Again.


Updated 30.1.16

This assisted digital lark isn't as easy as it looks. Yesterday's Rollercoaster recruitment ride - A story of recruiting participants with Assisted Digital needs tells us just what a rollercoaster it can be trying to find/recruit anyone who needs assistance with their digital.

The Government Digital Service's crack user research team tried farming out the work to recruitment agencies. There are problems with that approach. Problems which lead GDS to conclude that:
Our key learning point was that it might have been better to do the recruitment ourselves. We discovered that the agency’s recruiter had gone for the obvious options, which we could potentially have covered more effectively ourselves as well as searching further afield. Some services have found this to be more effective as well as better value for money.
"It might have been better to do the recruitment ourselves"? Nothing gets past them ...

... except that it might have been even better to start "recruiting" research subjects 1,646 days earlier on 28 July 2011 or 30 May 2012 or 23 May 2013 or 20 June 2013 or 31 July 2015 or any of the other dates on which the assisted digital project was meant to have started.

Presumably there's no hurry. Presumably the assisted digital team don't expect digital-by-default to start for a long while yet.


Updated 31.3.16

It looks as though GDS's assisted digital may at last have had its final start. It hit the ground running we learn today, five weeks after the event, fittingly enough with ... a retrospective, Back to the future - assisted digital retrospective workshop,

The assisted digital blog started on 28 July 2011. Since then "a lot has been learnt about researching user's assisted digital needs and developing support to meet those needs". For example, we already know that "a range of capability currently exists".

Lots of assisted digital suggestions were elicited at the workshop ("all captured on a sea of post it notes of course!") and "the key finding from the day was that departments and services need to work together to make these ideas happen".

"All in all it was a great day and a brilliant example of what can be achieved with everyone working together".


Updated 8.4.17

It's just over a year since GDS published Back to the future - assisted digital retrospective workshop, In all the time since then they've managed just two posts on the assisted digital blog, one in May 2016 and one in October.

No-one is asking GDS to do anything hasty about digital assistance. And in the 2,078 days since the assisted digital blog started on 28 July 2011, they haven't.

There again, we do have a census coming up in the UK in four years time – 2021 – and there's some hope among the powers that be that maybe it could be conducted largely on-line. You know the sort of thing ... filling in forms on screen rather than on paper ... the sort of thing you might expect GDS to have achieved after 10 years ... the sort of thing that will be difficult if we still have 12½ million adult residents incapable of using the web ...

... which is no doubt why the baton has been passed to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), please see It’s all about inclusion: how ONS plans to support the digital have-nots. GDS can't be expected to do everything.

GDS & assisted digital – the project that keeps on starting

When Martha-now-Lady Lane Fox decreed that all public services should be digital by default (14 October 2010) she created a problem – how do you avoid all the people unversed in digital ways being excluded by default?

The problem was given to the Government Digital Service (GDS) to solve. A strange choice. GDS's expertise is in building websites, not helping old ladies to fill in attendance allowance forms. What special knowledge would they bring to bear? None. GDS's natural inclination would be to devise a digital solution. That's their approach to all problems but in this case it's definitively inappropriate. It's strange that GDS accepted the rôle.

But accept it they did and they gave the problem a name – "assisted digital" – and they started blogging about it (28 July 2011). Nearly a year later (30 May 2012) they published Getting started on assisted digital.

Friday 25 October 2013

Kofi Annan, the NSA and GCHQ – maybe this time

NSA monitored calls of 35 world leaders after US official handed over contacts it said in the Guardian yesterday and in every other newspaper.

That comes as news to most of us.

But then we remember: "News that Kofi Annan and other senior UN figures may have been routinely bugged by US or British security services has caused a huge political row around the world. But it will also have caused alarm among other people in the public eye who deal with sensitive information - or anyone, indeed, who values their privacy" – that's from the BBC News website, 2 March 2004, 9½ years ago.

It didn't cause "a huge political row around the world" then.

Maybe this time. Maybe the penny is beginning to drop.

Individuals complaining about invasions of their privacy have little traction.

With companies, it's different. Once they realise that it is questionable whether any of their dealings can be conducted in confidence they will take action. And unlike individuals, they have money and lobbying power and politicians listen to them.

Kofi Annan, the NSA and GCHQ – maybe this time

NSA monitored calls of 35 world leaders after US official handed over contacts it said in the Guardian yesterday and in every other newspaper.

That comes as news to most of us.

But then we remember: "News that Kofi Annan and other senior UN figures may have been routinely bugged by US or British security services has caused a huge political row around the world. But it will also have caused alarm among other people in the public eye who deal with sensitive information - or anyone, indeed, who values their privacy" – that's from the BBC News website, 2 March 2004, 9½ years ago.

It didn't cause "a huge political row around the world" then.

Maybe this time. Maybe the penny is beginning to drop.

Next week's news

Just to remind you, some time over the next 168 hours, as promised, we shall see the first ever fruits of the Government Digital Service's identity assurance programme. We shall all be able to amend our tax codes through an on-line connection to HMRC.

Extraordinary, but they won't have the field to themselves.

Remember midata, the latter-day South Sea Bubble being blown by the Department for Business Innovation and Skills? They've been "fanning the flames of innovation" round at the midata Innovation Lab and some time over the next 168 hours we are promised a glimpse of the fruits of their labours, too.

At last, new apps to empower us and improve our lifestyles and make the economy grow.



There's not a single mooncalf left in the world who believes that these apps will be free, is there?



Suppose, just for the sake of argument, that the DMossEsq blog is right and that there is no such thing as a secure website.

Then it would be a mistake for any supplier to try to sell you a service on that basis – the secure website sales pitch undermines trust in any supplier using it. At least two of GDS's "identity providers" do just that. Mydex and Verizon both promise you security. That's a mistake. There are no unicorns for them to deliver.

Better, surely, to say that every effort will be made to keep your personal data secure, but security can't be guaranteed.

We have a sad new example of the problem. Experian Sold Consumer Data to ID Theft Service. It should be made clear that Experian didn't mean to sell consumer data to ID thieves and that they're co-operating fully with the police investigations. But it happened.

Experian, like Mydex and Verizon, are UK "identity providers", on whom GDS's identity assurance programme depends.



The best you can hope for is that security breaches will be kept to an affordable minimum. How do you achieve that? Answer, you make the supplier of the on-line service responsible for losses.

How have the UK retail banks managed so well to maintain public trust in on-line banking? By paying – when you are defrauded, the banks have to compensate you.

That works (para.6).

Next week's news

Just to remind you, some time over the next 168 hours, as promised, we shall see the first ever fruits of the Government Digital Service's identity assurance programme. We shall all be able to amend our tax codes through an on-line connection to HMRC.

Extraordinary, but they won't have the field to themselves.

Remember midata, the latter-day South Sea Bubble being blown by the Department for Business Innovation and Skills? They've been "fanning the flames of innovation" round at the midata Innovation Lab and some time over the next 168 hours we are promised a glimpse of the fruits of their labours, too.

At last, new apps to empower us and improve our lifestyles and make the economy grow.



Tuesday 22 October 2013

Cloud computing and the sizzling Stephen Fry

Mr Fry has made only one appearance on this blog so far. That was in connection with the UK government's vile bid to introduce press regulation.

Many more posts have covered the inept marketing device of comparing cloud computing with the utilities:
The reputation of the utilities for the past year and more has taken a beating and it defies logic how anyone could believe that comparing it to a utility would make us want to buy any service.

Utility prices keep going up. Large numbers of people already find themselves in fuel poverty. Now we are promised that it will soon cost £1,500 a year to supply our homes with gas and electricity. What kind of a model is that for cloud computing? Not an attractive one – IT poverty, anyone?

The analogy is inept. When you buy gas, say, you pay money and the gas company supplies gas. Done. With cloud computing, you pay money and you hand over all your data and the cloud computing company supplies some service. You are paying to lose control of your data.

It's a simple point. And irrefutable.

But Databarracks, the cloud computing company, cannot be numbered among the millions of readers of DMossEsq. Because, you won't believe it, they've just scored an unenviable double. Stephen Fry and the cloud computing-utility analogy all in one.

A treble, really, when you see that they employ the tiredest trick in the marketing armoury, a six-minute history of the world suggesting that the progress of civilisation has been leading ineluctably to this point, where you have to have whatever goods or services the marketing company's client is trying to flog:

Cloud computing and the sizzling Stephen Fry

Mr Fry has made only one appearance on this blog so far. That was in connection with the UK government's vile bid to introduce press regulation.

Many more posts have covered the inept marketing device of comparing cloud computing with the utilities:
The reputation of the utilities for the past year and more has taken a beating and it defies logic how anyone could believe that comparing it to a utility would make us want to buy any service.

Hyperinflation hits the unicorn market

We live on a diet of data hacking stories fed to us by the media. Have done for years.

There's no defence. Not for us mooncalves. Not even for US defence contractors, who should know all about cybersecurity but who nevertheless managed to lose, among other things, the designs for the F-22 and F-35 fighter jets.

"Every day, all around the world, thousands of IT systems are compromised", says Iain Lobhan, the Director of GCHQ. He should know.

The upshot is clear – there is no such thing as a secure website. Secure websites are like unicorns. They don't exist.

When the Department for Business Innovation and Skills, for example, talk about work on their midata initiative and tell us that "this work is still in development by the midata programme participants, but broadly the proposal is that to gain access to their Personal Data Inventory, the customer would have to log-in to a secure website where ..." they might as well advise us to log in to a unicorn.

The suppliers whose business depends on selling us secure websites know this. How are they going to convince us to carry on paying for unicorns?

They've got a tough job.

One approach is to stop talking about mere secure websites and to offer instead super secure websites, as we saw the other day: "Mydex is providing the super secure Personal Data Store (PDS) for identity verification that will ...".

Superunicorns?

That's a bit weak. Either these resources are secure or they're not. It's like being pregnant – indistinguishable from being superpregnant.

But having embarked on that course, there's only one way to go: "The Mydex Trust Framework is a set of legal and technical rules by which members of a network agree to operate in order to achieve trust online. At its core it delivers a trusted digital identity, a hyper secure personal data store and platform from which individuals can connect to each other and organisations for the bi-directional exchange of information in a secure and verified manner".

Hyperunicorns?

What next?

No unicorns, no trust
Judging by that last example, what's next is a thoroughgoing mangling of the concept of trust. Unless you believe in unicorns, when someone offers you a trust framework or a supertrust framework or a hypertrust superframework, be warned. Be superwarned. Be hyperwarned.

----------

Updated 11.4.14

The day before yesterday Murad Ahmed warned us in the Times:
Bug puts internet passwords at risk

... Security researchers said they have discovered the “heartbleed bug”, which is a problem in the way the majority of websites encrypt their sensitive data. About 60 per cent of websites use the affected software, known as OpenSSL – a way of protecting information such as names, passwords, messages and financial information as it passes between computers ...
How important is that?

In a crowded field of experts, readers are recommended to believe Bruce Schneier when he says: "On the scale of 1 to 10, this is an 11":
Basically, an attacker can grab 64K of memory from a server. The attack leaves no trace, and can be done multiple times to grab a different random 64K of memory. This means that anything in memory -- SSL private keys, user keys, anything -- is vulnerable. And you have to assume that it is all compromised. All of it.

"Catastrophic" is the right word. On the scale of 1 to 10, this is an 11.

Half a million sites are vulnerable, including my own. Test your vulnerability here.
To reiterate. If someone promises you a secure website, remember, whether they know it or not, it's really not in their gift, it doesn't exist, it's a unicorn, be hyperwarned.


Updated 19.11.14

The CloudStore has been re-written for the second or third time and re-named the Digital Marketplace. No surprise to DMossEsq's millions of readers.

The Government Digital Service (GDS) have written about it on their blog, please see Digital Marketplace: building a digital by default service. They have nothing to say about digital marketplaces.

They just bang on about their digital by default service standard.

That's the standard they were following, presumably, which meant that we now apply to register to vote in the UK using a system which has to work without GDS's identity assurance (IDA).

Not ideal but perhaps just as well since the first public service which incorporates a public test version of IDA seems to be unusable, despite satisfying all 26 criteria of the digital by default service standard. Bad luck DEFRA.

And good luck to all those G-Cloud suppliers who will rely on the Digital Marketplace and to the central and local government departments who try to buy services from them – just look at the logo GDS have chosen.


Updated 23.2.15

Some people never learn.

The media have stories every day about internet security breaches. The latest story that has burrowed through DMossEsq's thick skull concerns the US State Department.

Blomberg report that the State Department's email service was infiltrated several months ago and that, despite the most expert efforts, it remains infiltrated.

If the State Department can't deliver security there is no reason to believe that the UK's chirpy little Government Digital Service can. And yet, refusing to learn, these dinosaurs continue to offer the unicorn of internet security.

If you are tempted to sign up for their GOV.UK Verify identity assurance service (RIP), the first thing GDS tell you is that that it's secure. Who is there left on the planet who might believe that?


Far from helping to prevent identity theft, GOV.UK Verify is more likely to promote it by centralising the entire population's personal information in the databases of just a few "identity providers".

Not only do GDS want to centralise all personal information, they also want you to give up the relative safety of multiple logon IDs and passwords and replace it with a single key to your kingdom.

If against all the odds you pursue this wild goose chase and choose Digidentity as your GDS-sponsored "identity provider", they go even further:


"Infallible security"?

This is the sales pitch of an unreconstructed mountebank. It might have worked in the 20th century. It can't work in the 21st.

Hyperinflation hits the unicorn market

We live on a diet of data hacking stories fed to us by the media. Have done for years.

There's no defence. Not for us mooncalves. Not even for US defence contractors, who should know all about cybersecurity but who nevertheless managed to lose, among other things, the designs for the F-22 and F-35 fighter jets.

"Every day, all around the world, thousands of IT systems are compromised", says Iain Lobhan, the Director of GCHQ. He should know.

The upshot is clear – there is no such thing as a secure website. Secure websites are like unicorns. They don't exist.